Answer to Comments to the article “Five years of difficult experiences with the Act on the protection of animals used for scientific or educational purposes dated of January 15, 2015”

Authors

  • Marta Gajewska Narodowy Instytut Onkologii im. Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy
  • Joanna Gromadzka-Ostrowska Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie (II LKE w Warszawie)
  • Jan Konopacki Uniwersytet Łódzki
  • Krzysztof Turlejski Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
  • Cezary W. Watała Uniwersytet Medyczny w Łodzi
  • Krzysztof Wąsowicz Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie (LKE w Olsztynie)
  • Anna Wesołowska Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Collegium Medicum w Krakowie
  • Marek Wieczorek Uniwersytet Łódzki (LKE w Łodzi)
  • Piotr Wlaź Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie (LKE w Lublinie)
  • Romuald Zabielski Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie

Keywords:

laboratory animals’ regulations, implementation of EU Directive, local ethics committee function

Abstract

This is response of the authors of the article published in the “Nauka” (3/2020) to the polemic note published in the issue 1/2021. In the response, authors signaled the progressive difficulties in conducting research on animals, attributed to the practices of applying the “Act on the protection of animals used for scientific or educational purposes” of January 15, 2015. The use of animals for research in accordance with the provisions of the Act of 2015 was paid for by a number of ambiguities in the interpretation of the provisions of the Act, increased official reporting without any real effect on animal welfare, and increased pressure from some non-governmental organizations, whose aim is to completely block the conduct of animal research.

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)